Dischargeability of Divorce-Related Debts - March 22, 2010

Andrew Lloyd Webber (composer of Phantom of the Opera and many others) is 62 today

Subsection (15) of Section 523(a) was added to the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994 to expand the Section 523(a)(5) exception to discharge for marital debts.  Section 523(a)(15) provides that an individual is not discharged from any debt 

(15) not of the kind described in paragraph (5) that is incurred by the debtor in the course of a divorce or separation or in connection with a separation agreement, divorce decree, or other order of a court of record, a determination made in accordance with State or territorial law by a governmental unit unless - -

(A) the debtor does not have the ability to pay such debt from income or property of the debtor not reasonably necessary to be expended for the maintenance or support of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor and, if the debtor is engaged in a business, for the payment of expenditures necessary for the continuation, preservation, and operation of such business; or

(B) discharging such debt would result in a benefit to the debtor that outweighs the detrimental consequences to a spouse, former spouse, or child of the debtor.

 

Basically, subsection (15) makes nondischargeable all divorce-related debts other than alimony, maintenance, and child support, which are already nondischargeable pursuant to 523(a)(5).  

Section 523(a)(15) was analyzed in detail in the case In Re Crosswhite, 148 F.3d 879.  In that case, it was undisputed that the debts  sought to be discharged were divorce-related debts.  The key issues focused on the "exceptions to the exception" found in 523(a)(15)(A) and 523(a)(15)(B) and the relative burdens allocated to the parties.  The Court  found that the initial burden under both exceptions - the "ability to pay" test under 523(a)(15)(A) as well as the "detriment" test under 523(a)(15)(B) - belonged to the creditor.  The creditor bears the burden of proving that the claim against the debtor falls within 523(a)(15).  Once such a showing is made, however, the burden shifts back to the debtor to  demonstrate satisfaction of one of the two exceptions to the exception.  In that case, the 7th Circuit found that the lower courts had failed to properly allocate the burden of proving the exceptions to the exception on the Debtor, and therefore remanded the case for further fact inquiry consistent with that analysis.

In making such analysis, the 7th Circuit stated that the proper analysis was a "totality of the circumstances" test.  In that case, the analysis involved looking both at income of the ex-wife's new husband, as well as the income of the debtor's live-in girlfriend (or "spousal equivalent", using the court's term). 

 
Means Test - March 15, 2010

Eva Longoria (of Desperate Housewives fame) is 35 today

 

The Means Test was another change that was added by the 2005 changes to the bankruptcy law.  It's designed to force those that make over a certain amount to file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy instead of Chapter 7 under the theory that if the debtor is making over a certain amount of money (the "mean"), then he or she should be required to pay more back.  The initial threshold inquiry is determined by an objective standard based on the location of the debtor and the number of the debtor's dependents.  If the debtor makes below the mean for that region and number of dependents, then the presumption of abuse does not arise.  If a debtor's income exceeds the initial threshold, then further analysis is necessary.  This analysis is accomplished through a fairly complicated formula laid out in Bankruptcy Form 22A (in the case of Chapter 7 filings) or Form 22C (in the case of Chapter 13 filings).  Deductions are allowed for numerous items, and it is still possible for the presumption not to arise. Finally, even if a presumption of abuse does arise, it is possible for a debtor to overcome this presumption with facts which overcome the presumption.  One final note - if a debtor's debts are primarily non-consumer debts, then the means test analysis is complete, and no further action is required on the part of the debtor.  A presumption of abuse could still be asserted by the trustee, but the presumption will not arise automatically by resort to a comparison of the debtor's income with a mean.  Future blog entries will focus on specific aspects of the means test.

 
Taxes on Discharged Debt - March 8, 2010

Yuri Gagarin - Russian cosmonaut, world's first man in space - 76 years old today

 

One question I often get is whether or not a debtor must pay taxes on debt that is discharged in bankruptcy.  If a debtor negotiates with his or her creditors for a reduction in the amount of the debt, then this would normally be the case.  The debtor would receive a 1099 at the end of the year for what is known as cancellation of indebtedness income (or discharge of indebtedness income).  In the bankruptcy context, this issue is addressed in Section  108 of the Internal Revenue Code.  And thankfully the answer is a confident NO.  Section 108(a)(1)(A) specifically provides that indebtedness discharged in a Title 11 case (which covers all chapter of a bankruptcy filing) is not included in gross income.

 
Exceptions to Discharge - March 1, 2010

Ron Howard  - Little Richie Cunningham (or Opie if you want to go way back) is 56 today

 

Section 523 of the Bankruptcy  Code provides a laundry list of situations where a discharge is not allowed.  The text of the section is below.  The most common exceptions to discharge are:  (1) Child support or other domestic support obligations; (2) Taxes (although a discharge is possible for taxes under certain circumstances); (3)  Unlisted debts (although these can still be dischargeable in some cases).

 Here's a link to the full text of Bankcuptcy Code Section 523

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_11_00000523----000-.html.

 
Credit Counseling - February 22, 2010

George Washington - would be 278 years old today

All individual debtors are required to obtain a certificate from an approved credit counseling agency prior to filing for bankruptcy.  This requirement was added by the changes made to the bankruptcy laws in 2005, and it applies to all individual cases (including under Chapters 7, 11, and 13).  The usual cost for the course is around $50.  The Department of Justice maintains a list of approved credit counseling agencies, which can be accessed at the following link:  http://www.justice.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/ccde/cc_approved.htm.  On rare occasions, courts may allow for the waiver of the credit counseling requirement - after a showing of "exigent" circumstances.  But don't count on it. 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2
©2009 All rights reserved. Website by Marketing Specific, Inc.